Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/9557
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZarotiadou, E.en
dc.contributor.authorTsaparlis, G.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T16:50:01Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-24T16:50:01Z-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/9557-
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subjectlower secondary chemistryen
dc.subjectconstructivist method of teachingen
dc.subjectPiaget"™s theoryen
dc.subjectmeaningful-receptive method of teachingen
dc.subjectAusubel"™s theoryen
dc.subjectbasic chemical theoryen
dc.subjectstoichiometric calculationsen
dc.subjectdevelopmental levelen
dc.subjectgenderen
dc.subjectmotivational traitsen
dc.titleTeaching lower-secondary chemistry with a Piagetian constructivist and an Ausbelian meaningful-receptive method: a longitudinal comparisonen
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.identifier.primary10.1039/A9RP90005E-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2000/RP/A9RP90005E#!divAbstract-
heal.languageen-
heal.accesscampus-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Θετικών Επιστημών. Τμήμα Χημείαςel
heal.publicationDate2000-
heal.abstractTwo methods of teaching lower secondary chemistry were compared in this longitudinal study: a constructivist method (CM), based on Piaget"™s theory of cognitive development; and a meaningful-receptive method (MRM), based on Ausubel"™s theory of meaningful learning. In CM, students had an active involvement, while MRM was applied as a teacher-centred method with a number of improvements from learning theory e.g. use of advance organisers and of concept maps. 144 students of an urban experimental lower secondary school in Athens were divided into two groups and taught chemistry according to the two methods respectively. Teaching lasted two school years (grades eight and nine). One test on knowledge and simple application of basic chemical theory, and another test on stoichiometric calculations were used, at the end of the two grades, for the comparison of the two methods. Although the overall student achievement was low, the CM group scored statistically higher in theory in both grades, while in stoichiometric calculations, the superiority of the CM group occurred only in grade nine. The effect of developmental level, of gender and of motivational traits was also examined. Finally, the students generally expressed a preference for the CM.en
heal.publisherRoyal Society of Chemistryen
heal.journalNameChemistry Education Research and Practiceen
heal.journalTypepeer reviewed-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά). ΧΗΜ

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Tsaparlis-2000-Teaching lower-secondary.pdf183.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons