Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/31213
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorΑντωνόπουλος, Παναγιώτηςel
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-07T09:24:17Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-07T09:24:17Z-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/31213-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.26268/heal.uoi.11038-
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectΒυζαντινή διπλωματία και ξένοιel
dc.subjectΒυζαντινή διπλωματία και Πέρσεςel
dc.subjectΒυζαντινή διπλωματία και Ευρωπαίοιel
dc.subjectΔιαφορετικές τεχνικές συμπεριφοράς της Βυζαντινής διπλωματίαςel
dc.titleΤα διαφορετικά επίπεδα των ξένων στη βυζαντινή διπλωματίαel
heal.typejournalArticleel
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο περιοδικούel
heal.generalDescriptionσ. [39]-68el
heal.generalDescriptionΠερίληψη στα αγγλικάel
heal.classificationΒυζαντινή Αυτοκρατορία--Εξωτερικές σχέσειςel
heal.classificationΒυζαντινή Αυτοκρατορία--Ιστορίαel
heal.classificationΒυζαντινή Αυτοκρατορία--Διπλωματικές σχέσεις--Ευρώπηel
heal.classificationΒυζαντινή Αυτοκρατορία--Διπλωματικές σχέσεις--Περσίαel
heal.dateAvailable2021-07-07T09:25:18Z-
heal.languageelel
heal.accessfreeel
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Βιβλιοθήκη και Κέντρο Πληροφόρησηςel
heal.publicationDate2008-2013-
heal.bibliographicCitationΒιβλιογραφία: σ. 60-67el
heal.bibliographicCitationΠεριλαμβάνει βιβλιογραφικές παραπομπέςel
heal.abstractTHE DIFFERENT LEVELS OF STRANGERS IN BYZANTINE DIPLOMACY This article forms the extended version of a lecture given in April 2000. It reflects the various levels the Byzantines employed to classify the level of proximity and distance of various nations. Late antiquity is characterized by the difference between the complete strangers, i.e empires of an equal footing, such as Persia, or the Caliphate later, and the Germanic states which somehow form part of the Ecumene, and thus, they are never complete strangers. Notions such as the adoption, and later on, Christening by the emperor of a foreign ruler are also discussed. The formation of the Carolingian state and later on, the German empire, created a state of equal strength, and smaller countries revolved between the two great European powers. The Great Schism of A.D. 1054, and then the crusades which culminated to the fall of Constantinople in 1204, brought an even greater complication to the notion of a diplom atic stranger. This was not helped by the reestablishment of the empire after 1261, since old concepts of imperial assets were paired badly with the harsh reality of a minor declining state. The final conclusion is that, ironically, it was the very state that inherited Byzantine values after the final fall of Constantinople in 1453, Russia, that must be considered as the most distant and complete stranger, because, unlike other states that emulated and hence accepted, some proximity to Byzantium and thus aspects of a living empire, Russia simply awaited the fall of it so as to inherit its legacy as the “third Rome”.en
heal.publisherΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Φιλοσοφική Σχολή. Τμήμα Ιστορίας και Αρχαιολογίαςel
heal.journalNameΔωδώνη: Ιστορία και Αρχαιολογία: επιστημονική επετηρίδα του Τμήματος Ιστορίας και Αρχαιολογίας της Φιλοσοφικής Σχολής του Πανεπιστημίου Ιωαννίνων; Τόμος 38-42 (2008-2013)el
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewedel
heal.fullTextAvailabilitytrue-
Appears in Collections:Τόμος 38-42 (2008-2013)



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons