Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/6413Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Γκαστή, Ελένη | el |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-11-11T09:51:02Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-11-11T09:51:02Z | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/6413 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.26268/heal.uoi.9467 | - |
| dc.rights | Default License | - |
| dc.subject | Βιργίλιος Αινειάδα | el |
| dc.subject | Sunt lacrimae rerum et mentem mortalia tangunt (Aen. I 462) | other |
| dc.subject | Λατινική ποίηση | el |
| dc.title | Βιργιλίου Αινειάδα I 462: ένα βιργιλιανό παλίμψηστο | el |
| heal.type | journalArticle | - |
| heal.type.en | Journal article | en |
| heal.type.el | Άρθρο περιοδικού | el |
| heal.generalDescription | σ. [107]-126 | el |
| heal.generalDescription | Περίληψη στα αγγλικά | el |
| heal.classification | Vergilius Maro, Publius, 70-19 B.C. | en |
| heal.classification | Vergilius Maro, Publius. Aeneis | en |
| heal.classification | Βιργίλιος Μάρο, Πόπλιος, 70-19 π.Χ. | el |
| heal.classification | Αινειάδα--Ερμηνεία και κριτική | el |
| heal.classification | Επική ποίηση, Λατινική--Ιστορία και κριτική | el |
| heal.dateAvailable | 2015-11-11T09:52:02Z | - |
| heal.language | el | - |
| heal.access | free | - |
| heal.recordProvider | Πανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Βιβλιοθήκη και Κέντρο Πληροφόρησης | el |
| heal.publicationDate | 2001 | - |
| heal.bibliographicCitation | Βιβλιογραφία: σ. 123-126 | el |
| heal.abstract | Vergil’s Aen. I. 462, one of the oddest lines of the Aeneid, has increasingly attracted attention. Although the body of criticism that discusses this line is extensive, questions still remain. It is the intention of the present study to lead to new conclusions about the meaning of this line through a reappraisal of its context from a Bakhtinian point of view. Line 462 by focusing on the empathetic response of the viewer (Aeneas as a focaliser) and the anticipated reaction of the Carthaginians becomes polyphonic arid should be viewed as a palimsest (as a dialogical text). When read with Bakhtin’s «dialogism» in mind, such an emphasis on the shared experiences (i.e. Aeneas’ response is parallel to the Carthaginians* reaction and to the audience's emotional perception of the Aeneid) suggests an implicit assumption of the primacy of a polyphonic interpretation over a «monophonic» one. Nevertheless these voices detected in the polyphonic character of hie (461), res, mortalia, mens (462) are centripetal since they impose the unifying and ordering perspective of lacrimae. | en |
| heal.publisher | Πανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Φιλοσοφική Σχολή. Τμήμα Φιλολογίας | el |
| heal.journalName | Δωδώνη: Φιλολογία: επιστημονική επετηρίδα του Τμήματος Φιλολογίας της Φιλοσοφικής Σχολής του Πανεπιστημίου Ιωαννίνων; Τόμ. 30 (2000) | el |
| heal.journalType | peer-reviewed | - |
| heal.fullTextAvailability | true | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Τόμος 30 (2001) | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Βιργιλίου Αινειάδα Ι 462. Ένα βιργιλιανό παλίμψηστο.pdf | 14.72 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
