Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/37681
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorΡάντης, Κωνσταντίνοςel
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-21T11:02:57Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-21T11:02:57Z-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/37681-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.26268/heal.uoi.17389-
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectΆνθρωπος και φύσηel
dc.subjectΈννοια της φύσης (Kant)el
dc.subjectΤεχνική της φύσης (Kant)el
dc.subjectΑπελευθέρωση της φύσης (Marcuce)el
dc.subjectΠολίτης, Κώστας (ψευδώνυμο του Ευτύχη Μπιτσάκη)el
dc.titleΗ κριτική της κριτικής δύναμης του Kant και η απελευθέρωση της φύσης του Marcuseel
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο περιοδικούel
heal.secondaryTitleΜέρος πρώτο: γενική αρθρογραφίαel
heal.generalDescriptionσ. [17]-37el
heal.classificationKant, Immanuel, 1724-1804--Κριτική και ερμηνεία-
heal.classificationKant, Immanuel, 1724-1804--Πολιτικές και κοινωνικές απόψεις-
heal.classificationMarcuse, Herbert, 1898-1979--Ερμηνεία και κριτική-
heal.classificationΦιλοσοφία, Σύγχρονη-
heal.dateAvailable2024-05-21T11:03:57Z-
heal.languageel-
heal.accessfree-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Βιβλιοθήκη και Κέντρο Πληροφόρησηςel
heal.publicationDate2023-
heal.bibliographicCitationΒιβλιογραφία: σ. 34-36el
heal.bibliographicCitationΠεριέχει βιβλιογραφικές παραπομπέςel
heal.abstractThe relationship between reason and nature, or between subject and object, forms the core of Critical Theory. In particular, Kant’s third Critique plays a relevant role in Marcuse’s normative-utopian programme of a reconciliation of man with nature. Marcuse’s normative-utopian programme of the liberation of nature comes to full fruition in his work Counterrevolution and Revolt. The starting point of his analysis is the relationship between nature and man in late capitalism, in which nature is seen almost exclusively as raw material, free for unlimited exploitation, which results in a perpetuation of its violation. Marcuse shares Kant’s view of bridging the gap between nature and human freedom and between theoretical and practical reason. As is well-known, a new approach to the concept of nature can be found in Kant’s Critique of the power of judgment, especially in the “First Introduction to the Critique of the Power of Judgment”. Marcuse responds to Kant’s ideas by explicitly referring in his analysis to Kant’s terminology in order to conceptualize his own project. Following the tradition of Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno and Georg Lukacs, Marcuse considers the “formal or figurative natural technique” rather than the “real plastic or organic natural technique” to be suitable for his concept. The aesthetic experience implied in the Kantian ideas of “purposiveness without purpose” and of beauty as a “symbol of morality,” should encourage us to obtain a different view of the relation between society and nature, and to establish a different social state in which man and nature live together in reconciliation and in which their mutual relation is no longer primarily or exclusively determined from a utilitarian point of view. Keywords reflective judgment, formal or figurative natural technique, purposiveness without purpose, beauty as a symbol of morality, subject without teleology, liberation of natureen
heal.publisherΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Φιλοσοφική Σχολή. Τμήμα Φιλοσοφίαςel
heal.journalNameΔωδώνη: Τεύχος Τρίτο: επιστημονική επετηρίδα του Τμήματος Φιλοσοφίας της Φιλοσοφικής Σχολής του Πανεπιστημίου Ιωαννίνων; Τόμ. 40 (2020-2023)el
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewed-
heal.fullTextAvailabilitytrue-
Appears in Collections:Τόμος 40 (2020-2023) ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦΙΑΣ



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons