Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/31281
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorΡάντης, Κωνσταντίνοςel
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-24T08:28:15Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-24T08:28:15Z-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/31281-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.26268/heal.uoi.11106-
dc.rightsDefault License-
dc.subjectΑριστοτελική Αριστεράel
dc.subjectΑριστοτελική φιλοσοφίαel
dc.subjectΙστορία της φιλοσοφίας-
dc.titleO Αριστοτέλης , ο Avicenna και η "Αριστοτελική Αριστερά" στην ιστορία της φιλοσοφίας του Ernst Blochel
heal.typejournalArticleel
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο περιοδικούel
heal.generalDescriptionσ. [161]-189el
heal.generalDescriptionΠερίληψη στα αγγλικά-
heal.classificationBloch, Ernst, 1885-1977en
heal.classificationΑριστοτέλης ο Σταγειρίτης, 384-322--Ερμηνεία και κριτικήel
heal.classificationAvicenna, 980-1037en
heal.dateAvailable2021-08-24T08:29:16Z-
heal.languageelel
heal.accessfreeel
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Βιβλιοθήκη και Κέντρο Πληροφόρησηςel
heal.publicationDate2016-
heal.bibliographicCitationΒιβλιογραφία: σ. 185-188el
heal.bibliographicCitationΠεριλαμβάνει βιβλιογραφικές παραπομπέςel
heal.abstractIn 1952, under special circumstances, Ernst Bloch wrote a book entitled Avicenna and the Aristotelian Left. It treats of the philosophy of Avicenna, in particular of the problem of the relation between matter and form. Bloch sees in Avicenna’s conception of the matter a further development of Aristotelian philosophy, as in his view it transforms Aristotelian passive matter into an active one. Bloch therefore classifies Avicenna into an ‘Aristotelian Left’, thereby simultaneously sublating and saving Aristotelian philosophy. While Bloch reinterprets Aristotle’s concept of matter as inherently passive prima materia, he understands Avicenna’s concept of matter as active materia universalis. Today, Bloch’s view is no longer acknowledged, for neither is Avicenna’s conception of concrete universal matter identical with material universalis, nor is matter, according to Avicenna, active, since it was created. Moreover, there is no trace whatsoever of Avicenna’s philosophy in Bloch’s hypothesis of an active, emancipated natura naturans ‘from below’, as he fails to make a clear distinction between the philosophies of Avicenna and Averroes. Certain features of natura naturans that in the course of the history of philosophy have been transformed into nature as a self-begetting, dynamic subject, can be discovered in Bruno and Spinoza; a natura naturans, in Bloch’s sense the ‘activation of matter’, appears later in Schelling’s philosophy of nature. Thus Bloch’s treatise anticipates his concept of the ‘dialectics of matter’, presented in his work e as the evolution, through qualitative leaps, from anorganic forms to human intelligence.en
heal.publisherΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Φιλοσοφική Σχολή. Τμήμα Φιλοσοφίας, Παιδαγωγικής και Ψυχολογίαςel
heal.journalNameΔωδώνη: Μέρος Τρίτο: επιστημονική επετηρίδα του Τμήματος Φιλοσοφίας, Παιδαγωγικής και Ψυχολογίας της Φιλοσοφικής Σχολής του Πανεπιστημίου Ιωαννίνων; Τόμ. 38 (2016-2017)el
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewedel
heal.fullTextAvailabilitytrue-
Appears in Collections:Τόμος 38 (2016-2017)



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.