Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/31256
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMaletta, Santeother
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-14T09:06:09Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-14T09:06:09Z-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/31256-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.26268/heal.uoi.11081-
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectΠάπας Βενέδικτος ΙΣΤ' (κατά κόσμον Joseph Alois Ratzinger)el
dc.subjectΠολιτική Φιλοσοφίαel
dc.subjectΘρησκευτική Φιλοσοφίαel
dc.subjectΕκκοσμίκευσηel
dc.titlePolitics and religion in the post-secular society Habermas, Ratzinger and the theological-political questionen
heal.typejournalArticleel
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο περιοδικούel
heal.generalDescriptionσ. [71]-78el
heal.generalDescriptionΠερίληψη στα αγγλικάel
heal.classificationHabermas, Jürgen, 1929-de
heal.classificationHabermas, Jürgen--Πολιτικές και κοινωνικές απόψειςde
heal.classificationBenedict XVI, Pope, 1927-en
heal.classificationΘρησκεία και πολιτικήel
heal.classificationΘρησκεία και κράτοςel
heal.dateAvailable2021-07-14T09:07:10Z-
heal.languageenel
heal.accessfreeel
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Βιβλιοθήκη και Κέντρο Πληροφόρησηςel
heal.publicationDate2014-
heal.bibliographicCitationΒιβλιογραφία: σ. 78el
heal.abstractThe major aim of this paper is to answer the following question: How can Christianity contribute to the common good? After defining the meaning of “postsecular society” from a sociological viewpoint, I will focus on the possibility of a “political theology” (in the sense of Carl Schmitt) nowadays. In Italy this question was recently discussed with effect from the celebrations of the 1700th anniversary of the Edict of Milan (313 a.D.). In this occasion some scholars defended a perspective which can be defined as “neo-Augustinian”. I will present and discuss Joseph Ratzinger’s version of this perspective—which rejects Schmitt’s political theology in favor of a political ethos—in the light of the so-called Dilemma of Bockenforde (“The free secular state lives according to presuppositions that it cannot itself guarantee”). According to Ratzinger, Augustine’s doctrine of the “two cities” (the divine and the human) is still helpful as on one side it avoids any sacralization of social and political entities, while on the other side it recognizes their own autonomy and value. To preserve this healthy dualism it is necessary for the “divine city” to be present in the public realm not only through its single members but also as a community with its own juridical institutions. I will finally argue that a liberal state is required to take up the challenge of the “divine city” if it wants to defend its own liberal nature.en
heal.publisherΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Φιλοσοφική Σχολή. Τμήμα Φιλοσοφίας, Παιδαγωγικής και Ψυχολογίαςel
heal.journalNameΔωδώνη: Μέρος Τρίτο: επιστημονική επετηρίδα του Τμήματος Φιλοσοφίας, Παιδαγωγικής και Ψυχολογίας της Φιλοσοφικής Σχολής του Πανεπιστημίου Ιωαννίνων; Τόμ. 37 (2014-2015)el
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewedel
heal.fullTextAvailabilitytrue-
Appears in Collections:Τόμος 37 (2014-2015)



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons