Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/30849
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorΣφήκας, Θανάσηςel
dc.contributor.authorSfikas, Thanasis D.en
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-16T05:13:30Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-16T05:13:30Z-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/30849-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.26268/heal.uoi.10684-
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectΕμφύλιος Πόλεμοςel
dc.subjectΕλλάδαel
dc.subjectΑκαδημαϊκή ιστορίαel
dc.subjectΔημόσια ιστορίαel
dc.subjectΙστοριογραφίαel
dc.title«Κακή τη μοίρα»: ερμηνευτικά σχήματα του ελληνικού Εμφυλίου Πολέμου μεταξύ ακαδημαϊκής και δημόσιας ιστορίαςel
heal.typejournalArticleel
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο περιοδικούel
heal.secondaryTitle'Ill fortune': interpretations of the Greek Civil War between academic and public history (Τίτλος περίληψης)en
heal.generalDescriptionσσ. [239]-257el
heal.generalDescriptionΚείμενο στα ελληνικά με περίληψη στα αγγλικά με τον τίτλο: 'Ill fortune': interpretations of the Greek Civil War between academic and public historyel
heal.classificationΕλλάδα--Ιστορία--Εμφύλιος πόλεμος--Iστοριογραφίαel
heal.dateAvailable2021-04-16T05:14:30Z-
heal.languageelel
heal.accessfreeel
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Βιβλιοθήκη και Κέντρο Πληροφόρησηςel
heal.publicationDate2019-
heal.bibliographicCitationΒιβλιογραφία: σ. 254-256el
heal.bibliographicCitationΠεριλαμβάνει βιβλιογραφικές παραπομπές και πηγέςel
heal.abstractThis paper attempts an epistemological reading of the major historiographical interpretations of the causes and meaning(s) of the Greek Civil War of 1946-1949 both in their heavier academic versions and in their lighter ‘public history’ incarnations. The criterion for selecting the interpretations discussed is not their scope or the adequate and competent handling of the supporting evidence, for in that case the object of study would be limited. To construct an argument, the interpretations dealt with here are those that purport to be inclusive and wholesome. Alternately, and at different times, these interpretations present the Greek Civil War as a major publishing event, an impossible revolution, a string of fratricidal passions, a natural disaster such as floods and earthquakes, a three-phase communist conspiracy, even as ‘ill fortune, as Themistoklis Sofulis, the veteran leader of the Liberal Party would have it in October 1946. In a historiographical field plagued by a normative and prescriptive discourse that runs through the academia and the public sphere alike, the author has no interest in adding to it or setting it ‘right’. He limits himself to an alternative reading of the major historiographical interpretations of the Greek Civil War in the light of Thomas Kuhn’s epistemological thesis on ‘the structure of scientific revolutions’ and Panayiotis Kondylis’s contribution regarding the differences between normative and descriptive science and ‘the so-called methodological debates [...] amongst scholars’.en
heal.publisherΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Φιλοσοφική Σχολή. Τμήμα Ιστορίας και Αρχαιολογίαςel
heal.journalNameΔωδώνη: Τεύχος Πρώτο: επιστημονική επετηρίδα του Τμήματος Ιστορίας και Αρχαιολογίας της Φιλοσοφικής Σχολής του Πανεπιστημίου Ιωαννίνων; Τόμ. 45-46 (2016-2017)el
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewedel
heal.fullTextAvailabilitytrue-
Appears in Collections:Τόμος 45-46 (2016-2017)



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons