Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/30781Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Lekakou, Marika | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Myrland, Øystein | other |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-12T07:58:38Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-04-12T07:58:38Z | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/30781 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.26268/heal.uoi.10620 | - |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ | * |
| dc.subject | Grammar | en |
| dc.subject | Γραμματική | el |
| dc.subject | Μodals | en |
| dc.subject | Greek Grammar | en |
| dc.subject | Ελληνική Γραμματική | el |
| dc.subject | Τροπικά Ρήματα | el |
| dc.subject | Ελληνική Γλώσσα | el |
| dc.subject | Greek Language | en |
| dc.subject | Linguistics | en |
| dc.subject | Γλωσσολογία | el |
| dc.subject | Ελληνική Γλωσσολογία | el |
| dc.subject | Greek Linguistics | en |
| dc.title | What aspect can tell us about the future of "must" | en |
| heal.type | conferenceItem | el |
| heal.type.en | Conference presentation | en |
| heal.type.el | Δημοσίευση σε συνέδριο | el |
| heal.generalDescription | pp: 1- 13 | en |
| heal.language | en | el |
| heal.access | campus | el |
| heal.recordProvider | Πανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Τμήμα Φιλολογίας | el |
| heal.publicationDate | 2008 | - |
| heal.bibliographicCitation | Includes Bibliographic References | en |
| heal.abstract | According to a widespread view (Kratzer 1977 and subsequent work) modals arequantifiersover possible worlds, whose interpretation is heavily context dependent. On such an approach, grammatical factors are not readily expected to determine the available modal interpretations. We observe that grammatical aspect in Greek does precisely that: when perfective non-past is embedded under prepi ‘must’, only the deontic interpretation of the modal is available. The questions we address are (a) what the nature is of this clash between perfective non-past and epistemic interpretation of ‘must’ and (b) why only epistemic ‘must’, as opposed to deontic ‘must’ and to epistemic and root ‘may’, is sensitive to perfective aspect in this way. We derive the observation from the temporal properties of the perfective non-past and of epistemic ‘must’. While maintaining a Kratzerian approach to modals, we propose a modification of the structure of the epistemic modal base and of the workings of the ordering source, in order to explain the observed temporal properties of epistemic ‘must’. | en |
| heal.publisher | Proceedings of 8th International Conference of Greek Linguistics | other |
| heal.fullTextAvailability | true | - |
| heal.conferenceName | Proceedings of 8th International Conference of Greek Linguistics | - |
| heal.conferenceItemType | full paper | el |
| Appears in Collections: | Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) - ΦΛΛ | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What aspect can tell us about the future of 'must' (with Oystein Nilsen) .pdf | 94.89 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
