Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/22922
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMitsionis, G. I.en
dc.contributor.authorManoudis, G. N.en
dc.contributor.authorPaschos, N. K.en
dc.contributor.authorKorompilias, A. V.en
dc.contributor.authorBeris, A. E.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T19:28:44Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-24T19:28:44Z-
dc.identifier.issn1532-6500-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/22922-
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subjectAdolescenten
dc.subjectAdulten
dc.subjectAgeden
dc.subjectDecompression, Surgical/*methodsen
dc.subjectElbow/physiologyen
dc.subjectElectromyographyen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studiesen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden
dc.subjectOrthopedic Procedures/*methodsen
dc.subjectRecovery of Function/physiologyen
dc.subjectRetrospective Studiesen
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen
dc.subjectUlnar Nerve/physiologyen
dc.subjectUlnar Nerve Compression Syndromes/diagnosis/physiopathology/*surgeryen
dc.subjectYoung Adulten
dc.titleComparative study of surgical treatment of ulnar nerve compression at the elbowen
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.identifier.primary10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.014-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20149692-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://ac.els-cdn.com/S1058274609004637/1-s2.0-S1058274609004637-main.pdf?_tid=8de79fad1fadcc35dc4d39a4ddf734b6&acdnat=1333635539_194344cd5b94004abf580a04a384ec77-
heal.languageen-
heal.accesscampus-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικήςel
heal.publicationDate2010-
heal.abstractHYPOTHESIS: The optimal surgical treatment for cubital tunnel syndrome remains unclear. We aim to evaluate the long-term outcome of surgical treatment by comparing the results of the different methods proposed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 113 patients in whom 3 different surgical methods were used for cubital tunnel syndrome treatment. In situ decompression, partial epicondylectomy, and anterior subcutaneous transposition were performed from 1997 to 2007. RESULTS: Results were graded as excellent in 51 patients (45%), good in 34 (30%), fair in 8 (7%), and poor in 20 (18%). When we compared the results among the different surgical procedures, good and excellent results were achieved in 26 of 31 patients (84%) treated with in situ decompression, 36 of 45 (80%) treated with release and partial medial epicondylectomy, and 23 of 37 (62%) treated with release and anterior subcutaneous transposition of the nerve. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that in situ decompression and partial epicondylectomy both represent efficient and safe methods for cubital tunnel syndrome management. In patients in whom anterior subcutaneous transposition was performed, although they had a significant improvement of their clinical signs and symptoms, they had an inferior outcome when compared with patients treated with the other 2 methods.en
heal.journalNameJ Shoulder Elbow Surgen
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewed-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) - ΙΑΤ

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mitsionis-2010-Comparative study of.pdf992.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons