Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/22908
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorContopoulos-Ioannidis, D. G.en
dc.contributor.authorGilbody, S. M.en
dc.contributor.authorTrikalinos, T. A.en
dc.contributor.authorChurchill, R.en
dc.contributor.authorWahlbeck, K.en
dc.contributor.authorIoannidis, J. P.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T19:28:34Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-24T19:28:34Z-
dc.identifier.issn0002-953X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/22908-
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subjectAdulten
dc.subjectAntipsychotic Agents/therapeutic useen
dc.subjectBenzodiazepines/therapeutic useen
dc.subjectChilden
dc.subjectDatabases, Bibliographic/statistics & numerical dataen
dc.subjectDay Careen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectIntelligenceen
dc.subjectMental Disorders/drug therapy/*therapyen
dc.subjectMeta-Analysis as Topicen
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic/standards/*statistics & numerical dataen
dc.subjectResearch Design/standards/*statistics & numerical dataen
dc.subjectSample Sizeen
dc.subjectSchizophrenia/drug therapyen
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen
dc.titleComparison of large versus smaller randomized trials for mental health-related interventionsen
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.identifier.primary10.1176/appi.ajp.162.3.578-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15741476-
heal.languageen-
heal.accesscampus-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικήςel
heal.publicationDate2005-
heal.abstractOBJECTIVE: The extent of disagreement between large and smaller randomized, controlled trials on mental health issues is unknown. The authors aimed to compare the results of large versus smaller trials on mental health-related interventions. METHOD: The authors screened 161 Cochrane and 254 Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness systematic reviews on mental health-related interventions. They identified 16 meta-analyses with at least one "large" randomized trial with sample size >800 and at least one "smaller" trial. Effect sizes were calculated separately for large and smaller trials. Heterogeneity was assessed between all studies, within each group (large and smaller studies), and between large and smaller studies. RESULTS: Significant between-study heterogeneity was seen in five meta-analyses. By random-effects calculations, the results of large and smaller trials differed beyond chance in four meta-analyses (25%). In three of these disagreements (effect of day care on IQ, discontinuation of antidepressants, risperidone versus typical antipsychotics for schizophrenia), the smaller trials showed greater effect sizes than the large trials. The inverse was seen in one case (olanzapine versus typical antipsychotics for schizophrenia). With fixed-effects models, disagreements beyond chance occurred in five cases (31%). In four meta-analyses, the effect size differed over twofold between large and smaller trials. Various quality and design parameters were identified as potential explanations for some disagreements. CONCLUSIONS: Large trials are uncommon in mental health. Their results are usually comparable with the results of smaller studies, but major disagreements do occur. Both large and smaller trials should be scrutinized as they offer a continuum of randomized evidence.en
heal.journalNameAm J Psychiatryen
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewed-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) - ΙΑΤ

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons