Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/22905Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Papanikolaou, E. G. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Plachouras, N. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Drougia, A. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Andronikou, S. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Vlachou, C. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Stefos, T. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Paraskevaidis, E. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Zikopoulos, K. | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-11-24T19:28:32Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-11-24T19:28:32Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1477-7827 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/22905 | - |
| dc.rights | Default Licence | - |
| dc.subject | Adult | en |
| dc.subject | Cohort Studies | en |
| dc.subject | Dinoprostone/administration & dosage/*pharmacology | en |
| dc.subject | Female | en |
| dc.subject | Humans | en |
| dc.subject | Infant, Newborn | en |
| dc.subject | *Informed Consent | en |
| dc.subject | Labor, Induced/*methods | en |
| dc.subject | Misoprostol/administration & dosage/*pharmacology | en |
| dc.subject | Oxytocics/administration & dosage/*pharmacology | en |
| dc.subject | *Parity | en |
| dc.subject | Pregnancy | en |
| dc.subject | Pregnancy Outcome | en |
| dc.subject | Term Birth/*drug effects | en |
| dc.subject | Time Factors | en |
| dc.title | Comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for elective induction of labour in nulliparous women at full term: a randomized prospective study | en |
| heal.type | journalArticle | - |
| heal.type.en | Journal article | en |
| heal.type.el | Άρθρο Περιοδικού | el |
| heal.identifier.primary | 10.1186/1477-7827-2-70 | - |
| heal.identifier.secondary | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15450119 | - |
| heal.identifier.secondary | http://www.rbej.com/content/pdf/1477-7827-2-70.pdf | - |
| heal.language | en | - |
| heal.access | campus | - |
| heal.recordProvider | Πανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικής | el |
| heal.publicationDate | 2004 | - |
| heal.abstract | BACKGROUND: The objective of this randomized prospective study was to compare the efficacy of 50 mcg vaginal misoprostol and 3 mg dinoprostone, administered every nine hours for a maximum of three doses, for elective induction of labor in a specific cohort of nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix and more than 40 weeks of gestation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and sixty-three pregnant women with more than 285 days of gestation were recruited and analyzed. The main outcome measures were time from induction to delivery and incidence of vaginal delivery within 12 and 24 hours. Admission rate to the neonatal intensive care unit within 24 hours post delivery was a secondary outcome. RESULTS: The induction-delivery interval was significantly lower in the misoprostol group than in the dinoprostone group (11.9 h vs. 15.5 h, p < 0.001). With misoprostol, more women delivered within 12 hours (57.5% vs. 32.5%, p < 0.01) and 24 hours (98.7% vs. 91.4%, p < 0.05), spontaneous rupture of the membranes occurred more frequently (38.8% vs. 20.5%, p < 0.05), there was less need for oxytocin augmentation (65.8% vs. 81.5%, p < 0.05) and fewer additional doses were required (7.5% vs. 22%, p < 0.05). Although not statistically significant, a lower Caesarean section (CS) rate was observed with misoprostol (7.5% vs. 13.3%, p > 0.05) but with the disadvantage of higher abnormal fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings (22.5% vs. 12%, p > 0.05). From the misoprostol group more neonates were admitted to the intensive neonatal unit, than from the dinoprostone group (13.5% vs. 4.8%, p > 0.05). One woman had an unexplained stillbirth following the administration of one dose of dinoprostone. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal misoprostol, compared with dinoprostone in the regimens used, is more effective in elective inductions of labor beyond 40 weeks of gestation. Nevertheless, this is at the expense of more abnormal FHR tracings and more admissions to the neonatal unit, indicating that the faster approach is not necessarily the better approach to childbirth. | en |
| heal.journalName | Reprod Biol Endocrinol | en |
| heal.journalType | peer-reviewed | - |
| heal.fullTextAvailability | TRUE | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) - ΙΑΤ | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Papanikolaou-2004-Comparison of misopr.pdf | 253.63 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
