Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/22824
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNtzani, E. E.en
dc.contributor.authorLiberopoulos, G.en
dc.contributor.authorManolio, T. A.en
dc.contributor.authorIoannidis, J. P.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T19:27:34Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-24T19:27:34Z-
dc.identifier.issn1432-1203-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/22824-
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.titleConsistency of genome-wide associations across major ancestral groupsen
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.identifier.primary10.1007/s00439-011-1124-4-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22183176-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://www.springerlink.com/content/e2441j0tg4411780/fulltext.pdf-
heal.languageen-
heal.accesscampus-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικήςel
heal.publicationDate2011-
heal.abstractIt is not well known whether genetic markers identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) confer similar or different risks across people of different ancestry. We screened a regularly updated catalog of all published GWAS curated at the NHGRI website for GWAS-identified associations that had reached genome-wide significance (p </= 5 x 10(-8)) in at least one major ancestry group (European, Asian, African) and for which replication data were available for comparison in at least two different major ancestry groups. These groups were compared for the correlation between and differences in risk allele frequencies and genetic effects' estimates. Data on 108 eligible GWAS-identified associations with a total of 900 datasets (European, n = 624; Asian, n = 217; African, n = 60) were analyzed. Risk-allele frequencies were modestly correlated between ancestry groups, with >10% absolute differences in 75-89% of the three pairwise comparisons of ancestry groups. Genetic effect (odds ratio) point estimates between ancestry groups correlated modestly (pairwise comparisons' correlation coefficients: 0.20-0.33) and point estimates of risks were opposite in direction or differed more than twofold in 57%, 79%, and 89% of the European versus Asian, European versus African, and Asian versus African comparisons, respectively. The modest correlations, differing risk estimates, and considerable between-association heterogeneity suggest that differential ancestral effects can be anticipated and genomic risk markers may need separate further evaluation in different ancestry groups.en
heal.journalNameHum Geneten
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewed-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) - ΙΑΤ

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ntzani-2011-Consistency of genom.pdf916.72 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons