Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/22729
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDilmanian, F. A.en
dc.contributor.authorKalef-Ezra, J.en
dc.contributor.authorPetersen, M. J.en
dc.contributor.authorBozios, G.en
dc.contributor.authorVosswinkel, J.en
dc.contributor.authorGiron, F.en
dc.contributor.authorRen, B.en
dc.contributor.authorYakupov, R.en
dc.contributor.authorAntonakopoulos, G.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T19:26:29Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-24T19:26:29Z-
dc.identifier.issn1522-1865-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/22729-
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subjectAngioplasty, Balloon/*adverse effectsen
dc.subjectAnimalsen
dc.subjectCarotid Artery, Common/*pathology/radiation effects/*surgeryen
dc.subjectCarotid Stenosis/*therapyen
dc.subjectDisease Models, Animalen
dc.subjectDose-Response Relationship, Radiationen
dc.subjectGraft Occlusion, Vascular/*etiology/*radiotherapyen
dc.subjectHyperplasia/etiology/radiotherapyen
dc.subjectModels, Cardiovascularen
dc.subjectRatsen
dc.subjectRats, Sprague-Dawleyen
dc.subjectTunica Intima/pathology/radiation effectsen
dc.subjectX-Raysen
dc.titleCould X-ray microbeams inhibit angioplasty-induced restenosis in the rat carotid artery?en
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.identifier.primary10.1016/S1522-1865(03)00180-X-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14984714-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://ac.els-cdn.com/S152218650300180X/1-s2.0-S152218650300180X-main.pdf?_tid=21f24bcc7ec77af1f3a3d27fa9e17420&acdnat=1333088136_78b2e4409f4104eb3323a871591e6dab-
heal.languageen-
heal.accesscampus-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικήςel
heal.publicationDate2003-
heal.abstractBACKGROUND: Parallel, thin (<100 microm) planes of synchrotron-generated X rays, have been shown to spare normal tissues and preferentially damage tumors in animal models. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of such microbeams directed unidirectionally on angioplasted rat carotid arteries. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three groups of Sprague-Dawley rats were studied: (a) rats with normal, untreated arteries, (b) rats treated by balloon angioplasty, but not irradiated, and (c) rats treated with balloon angioplasty and exposed to single fraction, unidirectional, parallel, microbeams an hour after angioplasty. The microbeam array, 15 mm widex7.6 mm high, consisting of 27-microm-wide beam slices, spaced 200 microm center-to-center laterally traversed the damaged artery. The in-depth in-beam dose was 150 Gy, the "valley" dose (dose midway between microbeams resulting mainly from X-ray scattering) was 4.5 Gy on average, and the "integrated" (averaged) dose was 26 Gy. RESULTS: Microbeam irradiation, as given in the present study, was tolerated, but was insufficient to significantly suppress the neointimal hyperplasia. DISCUSSION: The microbeam dose used is considered low. Dose escalation would be necessary to reach conclusive results regarding the X-ray microbeam efficacy to control restenosis.en
heal.journalNameCardiovasc Radiat Meden
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewed-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) - ΙΑΤ

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Dilmanian-2003-Could X-ray microbea.pdf385.54 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons