Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/22495
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBerthelot, J. M.en
dc.contributor.authorBernelot-Moens, H. J.en
dc.contributor.authorKlarlund, M.en
dc.contributor.authorMcGonagle, D.en
dc.contributor.authorCalin, A.en
dc.contributor.authorSchumacher, H. R.en
dc.contributor.authorCombe, B.en
dc.contributor.authorDe Bandt, M.en
dc.contributor.authorDrosos, A. A.en
dc.contributor.authorFlipo, R. M.en
dc.contributor.authorHarris, B. J.en
dc.contributor.authorKaarela, K.en
dc.contributor.authorLe Goff, P.en
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, O.en
dc.contributor.authorPunzi, L.en
dc.contributor.authorZerbini, C. A.en
dc.contributor.authorSaraux, A.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T19:24:33Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-24T19:24:33Z-
dc.identifier.issn0392-856X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/22495-
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subjectArthritis, Rheumatoid/classification/*diagnosisen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectInternationalityen
dc.subjectPilot Projectsen
dc.subjectPractice Guidelines as Topicen
dc.subjectQuestionnairesen
dc.subjectSpondylarthropathies/classification/*diagnosisen
dc.titleDifferences in understanding and application of 1987 ACR criteria for rheumatoid arthritis and 1991 ESSG criteria for spondylarthropathy. A pilot surveyen
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12051392-
heal.languageen-
heal.accesscampus-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικήςel
heal.publicationDate2002-
heal.abstractOBJECTIVES: To determine areas of agreement and disagreement among experts in the interpretation of the published criteria for RA (ACR) and spondylarthropathies ( ESSG). METHODS: Thirty-two experts (16 from France and 16 from 10 other countries) replied anonymously to a mailed questionnaire. RESULTS: Tenosynovitis and 'sausage-like' painless swelling of the toes were considered as criteria for RA by 18 and 14 experts, respectively. The definition of symmetry differed widely among experts (symmetry of only one group of joints was sufficient for 13). Twenty-five experts considered erosions of other joints than the wrists and fingers as a criterion for RA, 17 thought that fulfilment of criteria could be achieved cumulatively, and 19 would appreciate clarifications of the current criteria. Among possible clarifications for RA, it was frequently recommended that morning stiffness and nodules be eliminated and that new marker antibodies, X-rays of the feet, and exclusion criteria be added. Twenty-three of the 29 experts who gave an opinion (79%) agreed with the notion of SP in the absence of axial signs and sacroiliitis, 26/31 (84%) indicated that a patient can have both RA and SP, and 19/30 (63%) thought that RA and SP could be regarded as syndromes more than diseases. Only 5/32 experts relied more on the criteria than on their clinical judgement in diagnosing RA. CONCLUSIONS: There would seem to be a needfor the optimisation of RA and ESSG criteria, particularly within the context of early arthritis.en
heal.journalNameClin Exp Rheumatolen
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewed-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) - ΙΑΤ

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons