Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/22156
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStefos, T.en
dc.contributor.authorDeter, R. L.en
dc.contributor.authorSimon, N. V.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T19:22:18Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-24T19:22:18Z-
dc.identifier.issn0091-2751-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/22156-
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subject*Embryonic and Fetal Developmenten
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectMathematicsen
dc.subject*Models, Biologicalen
dc.subjectPregnancyen
dc.subjectPregnancy Trimester, Seconden
dc.subjectPregnancy Trimester, Thirden
dc.subjectTime Factorsen
dc.subject*Ultrasonographyen
dc.titleEffect of timing of initial scan and interval between scans on Rossavik growth model specificationen
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2499595-
heal.languageen-
heal.accesscampus-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικήςel
heal.publicationDate1989-
heal.abstractThe effect of the time of the initial scan and the interval between the two scans needed for Rossavik growth model specification was evaluated in 20 normally growing fetuses. Based on systematic and random prediction errors, determined by comparing predicted values to measured values obtained after 27 weeks, menstrual age, optimal results for all parameters studied were obtained with an initial scan at 18 weeks and an interval of 6 weeks between scans. For one-dimensional parameters--head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur diaphysis length (FDL)--similar results were obtained with an initial scan at 15 weeks and an interval of 3 weeks, but systematic overestimations were seen with 9-week intervals for HC. Studies with three-dimensional parameters--head cube, abdominal cube, and estimated weight--indicated that the timing of the initial scan was not critical, although less variability was seen with the initial scan at 18 weeks. However, the use of 3-week and 9-week intervals (instead of 6 weeks) produced significant systematic errors that varied with the parameter studied. These results suggest that Rossavik growth model specification is possible under a variety of conditions, but both the timing of the initial scan and the interval between scans must considered for each parameter.en
heal.journalNameJ Clin Ultrasounden
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewed-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) - ΙΑΤ

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons