Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/21960
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKalef-Ezra, J. A.en
dc.contributor.authorKaravasilis, S.en
dc.contributor.authorKouvelos, G.en
dc.contributor.authorDristiliaris, D.en
dc.contributor.authorMichalis, L. K.en
dc.contributor.authorMatsagkas, M.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T19:19:24Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-24T19:19:24Z-
dc.identifier.issn0021-9509-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/21960-
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subjectAgeden
dc.subjectAged, 80 and overen
dc.subjectAortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/*radiography/*surgeryen
dc.subjectAortography/*adverse effectsen
dc.subject*Endovascular Proceduresen
dc.subjectFluoroscopy/adverse effectsen
dc.subjectGreeceen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden
dc.subjectOccupational Diseases/etiology/*prevention & controlen
dc.subjectOccupational Exposureen
dc.subjectPredictive Value of Testsen
dc.subject*Radiation Dosageen
dc.subjectRadiation Injuries/etiology/*prevention & controlen
dc.subjectRadiography, Interventional/*adverse effectsen
dc.subjectRisk Assessmenten
dc.subjectRisk Factorsen
dc.subjectRisk Reduction Behavioren
dc.subjectThermoluminescent Dosimetryen
dc.subjectTime Factorsen
dc.subjectTomography, X-Ray Computed/*adverse effectsen
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen
dc.titleEndovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: methods of radiological risk reductionen
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22051986-
heal.languageen-
heal.accesscampus-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικήςel
heal.publicationDate2011-
heal.abstractAIM: The management of abdominal aortic aneurysm with endovascular repair (EVAR) requires extended exposure to ionizing radiation, before, during and after the intervention. The aim of this study was to quantify the radiological risks to patients and operating team, and to develop strategies to assess and reduce them. METHODS: EVAR was carried out in 97 patients using either a low-power mobile or a high-power stationary fluoroscopic unit. Empirically determined relationships between the indicated dose area product (DAP) and peak skin dose, obtained by direct in vivo dosimetry in a subgroup of patients, were used to predict the peak skin dose. Individual worker monitoring was used to assess personnel radiological burden. RESULTS: The probability for radiation induced biological effects due to the repair itself and the preoperative and life-long surveillance, as carried out, was about 2.4 10-3. The peak skin dose of repairs was linearly correlated with the DAP and did not exceed 1.2 Gy. The collective effective dose of the staff that carried out repairs using the mobile unit was 5.5 and 8 muSv per repair using an angiographic and a surgical table, respectively. The use of the high-power fluoroscopic unit resulted in a many fold higher radiation burden to both patient and personnel. CONCLUSION: The optimum strategy, including equipment-related factors, procedure-conduct factors and follow-up procedures, has to be studied, justified and optimized in each medical facility.en
heal.journalNameJ Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)en
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewed-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) - ΙΑΤ

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons