Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/21787
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorParaskevaidis, E.en
dc.contributor.authorKitchener, H. C.en
dc.contributor.authorMalamou-Mitsi, V.en
dc.contributor.authorAgnanti, N.en
dc.contributor.authorLolis, D.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T19:17:31Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-24T19:17:31Z-
dc.identifier.issn0029-7844-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/21787-
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subjectAdulten
dc.subjectBiopsy/*adverse effects/methodsen
dc.subjectBurns/etiology/pathologyen
dc.subjectCervix Uteri/*injuries/pathology/surgeryen
dc.subjectDiathermy/*adverse effectsen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectLasers/*adverse effectsen
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden
dc.subjectProspective Studiesen
dc.titleThermal tissue damage following laser and large loop conization of the cervixen
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7936506-
heal.languageen-
heal.accesscampus-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικήςel
heal.publicationDate1994-
heal.abstractOBJECTIVE: To compare thermal injury zones produced with laser and diathermy loop conization. METHODS: Excisional cervical specimens (cones and cervices) were obtained from 40 consecutive women who underwent abdominal hysterectomy. The subjects were assigned to have either laser or diathermy loop conization (20 in each group). The duration of each procedure was recorded. Histopathologic measurements of thermal injury zones were performed in all specimens. RESULTS: The techniques produced cone specimens of similar depth. The mean depth of thermal injury produced with laser conization in cone specimens (mean +/- standard deviation 0.49 +/- 0.16 mm) and cervical craters (0.58 +/- 0.24 mm) was significantly greater (P < .001) than the corresponding depth in cone specimens (0.22 +/- 0.09 mm) and cervical craters (0.27 +/- 0.11 mm) obtained by diathermy loop excision. The mean time of the two procedures was also significantly different (P < .001); laser conization 11 +/- 4.5 minutes and loop conization 2 +/- 1.2 minutes. CONCLUSION: For routine conization, loop diathermy causes less thermal damage to the specimen and is a faster procedure than laser.en
heal.journalNameObstet Gynecolen
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewed-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) - ΙΑΤ

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons