Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/21609
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPanagiotou, O. A.en
dc.contributor.authorIoannidis, J. P.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T19:16:04Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-24T19:16:04Z-
dc.identifier.issn1464-3685-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/21609-
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.titleWhat should the genome-wide significance threshold be? Empirical replication of borderline genetic associationsen
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.identifier.primary10.1093/ije/dyr178-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22253303-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/41/1/273.full.pdf-
heal.languageen-
heal.accesscampus-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικήςel
heal.publicationDate2012-
heal.abstractBACKGROUND: Robust replication is a sine qua non for the rigorous documentation of proposed associations in the genome-wide association (GWA) setting. Currently, associations of common variants reaching P </= 5 x 10(-8) are considered replicated. However, there is some ambiguity about the most suitable threshold for claiming genome-wide significance. METHODS: We defined as 'borderline' associations those with P > 5 x 10(-8) and P </=1 x 10(-7). The eligible associations were retrieved using the 'Catalog of Published Genome-Wide Association Studies'. For each association we assessed whether it reached P </= 5 x 10(-8) with inclusion of additional data from subsequent GWA studies. RESULTS: Thirty-four eligible genotype-phenotype associations were evaluated with data and clarifications contributed from diverse investigators. Replication data from subsequent GWA studies could be obtained for 26 of them. Of those, 19 associations (73%) reached P </= 5 x 10(-8) for the same or a related trait implicating either the exact same allele or one in very high linkage disequilibrium and 17 reached P < 10(-8). If the seven associations that did not reach P </= 5 x 10(-8) when additional data were considered are assumed to have been false-positives, the false-discovery rate for borderline associations is estimated to be 27% [95% confidence interval (CI) 12-48%]. For five associations, the current P-value is > 10(-6) [corresponding false-discovery rate 19% (95% CI 7-39%)]. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion, but not all, of the associations with borderline genome-wide significance represent replicable, possibly genuine associations. Our empirical evaluation suggests a possible relaxation in the current GWS threshold.en
heal.journalNameInt J Epidemiolen
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewed-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) - ΙΑΤ

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Panagiotou-2012-What should the geno.pdf172.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons