Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/20090
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIoannidis, J. P.en
dc.contributor.authorContopoulos-Ioannidis, D. G.en
dc.contributor.authorChew, P.en
dc.contributor.authorLau, J.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T19:04:42Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-24T19:04:42Z-
dc.identifier.issn0305-7453-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/20090-
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subjectAcute Diseaseen
dc.subjectAnti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects/*therapeutic useen
dc.subjectAzithromycin/adverse effects/*therapeutic useen
dc.subjectChi-Square Distributionen
dc.subjectConfidence Intervalsen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectOdds Ratioen
dc.subjectOtitis Media/diagnosis/drug therapyen
dc.subjectPharyngitis/diagnosis/drug therapyen
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic/*statistics & numerical dataen
dc.subjectRespiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis/*drug therapyen
dc.subjectSinusitis/diagnosis/drug therapyen
dc.titleMeta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the comparative efficacy and safety of azithromycin against other antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infectionsen
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11679557-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://jac.oxfordjournals.org/content/48/5/677.full.pdf-
heal.languageen-
heal.accesscampus-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικήςel
heal.publicationDate2001-
heal.abstractWe carried out a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing 3-5 days of azithromycin with other antibiotics that are typically given in longer courses for the treatment of upper respiratory tract infections. For acute otitis media (19 comparisons including 3421 patients), acute sinusitis (11 comparisons including 1742 patients) and acute pharyngitis (16 comparisons including 2447 patients), azithromycin had similar clinical failure rates to the other antibiotics [random effects odds ratios 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-1.54; 0.91, 95% CI 0.60-1.39; and 1.07, 95% CI 0.59-1.94, respectively]. The difference in clinical failures was <0.5%, and no 95% CIs exceeded 2.0%. There was no heterogeneity between studies. Subtle differences between comparators could have been due to chance. There were no significant differences in bacteriological outcomes. Azithromycin was discontinued because of adverse events in only 37 of 4870 (0.8%) patients. Short courses of azithromycin are as effective as longer courses of other antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections. Convenience of dosing should be balanced against the increased cost of this regimen for the treatment of these common infections, where often no antibiotic may be indicated at all.en
heal.journalNameJ Antimicrob Chemotheren
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewed-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) - ΙΑΤ

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ioannidis-2001-Meta-analysis of ran.pdf217.63 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons