Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/19760
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSigounas, D. E.en
dc.contributor.authorTatsioni, A.en
dc.contributor.authorChristodoulou, D. K.en
dc.contributor.authorTsianos, E. V.en
dc.contributor.authorIoannidis, J. P.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T19:02:04Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-24T19:02:04Z-
dc.identifier.issn1536-4828-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/19760-
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subjectAcute Diseaseen
dc.subjectBiological Markers/*analysisen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectOutcome Assessment (Health Care)/methodsen
dc.subjectPancreatitis/*diagnosis/*metabolismen
dc.subjectPrognosisen
dc.subjectReproducibility of Resultsen
dc.subjectSensitivity and Specificityen
dc.titleNew prognostic markers for outcome of acute pancreatitis: overview of reporting in 184 studiesen
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.identifier.primary10.1097/MPA.0b013e31820bf8ac-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21343832-
heal.languageen-
heal.accesscampus-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικήςel
heal.publicationDate2011-
heal.abstractOBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the reporting of studies on new prognostic markers of outcome in acute pancreatitis. METHODS: We used MEDLINE searches complemented with perusal of review articles' references to identify eligible English-language studies. We included studies evaluating nonroutine markers for acute pancreatitis. Eligible outcomes included Atlanta criteria, Japanese criteria for severity, multiple/single organ failure, complications, interventional treatment, hospitalization length, and death. We generated a 47-item checklist on Acute Pancreatitis Prognosis by adapting a previously constructed reporting guidance instrument for prognostic tumor markers (REMARK [Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies]). The checklist addresses the reporting of essential information in prognostic studies. RESULTS: The 184 identified eligible studies reported on 196 different prognostic markers. One hundred forty-four studies (78.3%) found at least 1 prognostic marker to be nominally statistically significant. Significant improvements over time were seen in the reporting for 17 items, but major deficiencies were noted even in 2004-2009 studies. Particularly, 12 items were reported in less than 10% of studies overall and even within the most recent studies. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some improvements over time, the reporting of important aspects of prognostic studies in acute pancreatitis remains suboptimal. The proposed REMARK-based checklist may help improve the quality and reporting of research in this field.en
heal.journalNamePancreasen
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewed-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) - ΙΑΤ

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons