Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/19402Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Katritsis, D. G. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Ioannidis, J. P. | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-11-24T18:59:44Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-11-24T18:59:44Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1524-4539 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/19402 | - |
| dc.rights | Default Licence | - |
| dc.subject | Angina Pectoris/therapy | en |
| dc.subject | *Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/adverse effects/statistics & numerical data | en |
| dc.subject | Bayes Theorem | en |
| dc.subject | Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use | en |
| dc.subject | Coronary Artery Disease/therapy | en |
| dc.subject | Coronary Disease/drug therapy/surgery/*therapy | en |
| dc.subject | Coronary Stenosis/therapy | en |
| dc.subject | Death | en |
| dc.subject | Female | en |
| dc.subject | Humans | en |
| dc.subject | Male | en |
| dc.subject | Middle Aged | en |
| dc.subject | Myocardial Infarction | en |
| dc.subject | Myocardial Revascularization | en |
| dc.subject | Odds Ratio | en |
| dc.subject | Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic | en |
| dc.subject | Risk Assessment | en |
| dc.subject | Treatment Outcome | en |
| dc.title | Percutaneous coronary intervention versus conservative therapy in nonacute coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis | en |
| heal.type | journalArticle | - |
| heal.type.en | Journal article | en |
| heal.type.el | Άρθρο Περιοδικού | el |
| heal.identifier.primary | 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.521864 | - |
| heal.identifier.secondary | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15927966 | - |
| heal.identifier.secondary | http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/111/22/2906.full.pdf | - |
| heal.language | en | - |
| heal.access | campus | - |
| heal.recordProvider | Πανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικής | el |
| heal.publicationDate | 2005 | - |
| heal.abstract | BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to improve symptoms compared with conservative medical treatment in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD); however, there is limited evidence on the effect of PCI on the risk of death, myocardial infarction, and subsequent revascularization. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials comparing PCI to conservative treatment in patients with stable CAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 2950 patients were included in the meta-analysis (1476 received PCI, and 1474 received conservative treatment). There was no significant difference between the 2 treatment strategies with regard to mortality, cardiac death or myocardial infarction, nonfatal myocardial infarction, CABG, or PCI during follow-up. By random effects, the risk ratios (95% CIs) for the PCI versus conservative treatment arms were 0.94 (0.72 to 1.24), 1.17 (0.88 to 1.57), 1.28 (0.94 to 1.75), 1.03 (0.80 to 1.33), and 1.23 (0.80 to 1.90) for these 5 outcomes, respectively. A possible survival benefit was seen for PCI only in trials of patients who had a relatively recent myocardial infarction (risk ratio 0.40, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.95). Except for PCI during follow-up, there was no significant between-study heterogeneity for any outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic stable CAD, in the absence of a recent myocardial infarction, PCI does not offer any benefit in terms of death, myocardial infarction, or the need for subsequent revascularization compared with conservative medical treatment. | en |
| heal.journalName | Circulation | en |
| heal.journalType | peer-reviewed | - |
| heal.fullTextAvailability | TRUE | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) - ΙΑΤ | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katritsis-2005-Percutaneous coronar.pdf | 340.45 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
