Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/18765
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGossios, K. J.en
dc.contributor.authorTsianos, E. V.en
dc.contributor.authorDemou, L. L.en
dc.contributor.authorTatsis, C. K.en
dc.contributor.authorPapakostas, V. P.en
dc.contributor.authorMasalas, C. N.en
dc.contributor.authorMerkouropoulos, M. C.en
dc.contributor.authorKontogiannis, D. S.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T18:54:53Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-24T18:54:53Z-
dc.identifier.issn0364-2356-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/18765-
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subjectAdenocarcinoma/*radiographyen
dc.subjectBicarbonates/diagnostic useen
dc.subjectContrast Mediaen
dc.subjectDiatrizoate Meglumine/diagnostic useen
dc.subjectDrug Combinationsen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectGastritis, Hypertrophic/*radiographyen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden
dc.subject*Pneumoradiographyen
dc.subjectSilicones/diagnostic useen
dc.subject*Sodium Bicarbonateen
dc.subjectStomach Neoplasms/*radiographyen
dc.subjectTomography, X-Ray Computed/*methodsen
dc.subjectWater/*diagnostic useen
dc.titleUse of water or air as oral contrast media for computed tomographic study of the gastric wall: comparison of the two techniquesen
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1936768-
heal.languageen-
heal.accesscampus-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικήςel
heal.publicationDate1991-
heal.abstractThirty-four patients with a high suspicion of gastric lesion at endoscopy were studied by two computed tomographic (CT) techniques: one using a gas-producing agent and the other using water as an oral contrast media. Intravenous contrast medium was also given in all patients who underwent the water technique. Final histologic proof was obtained either by endoscopy or at surgery. Both CT techniques detected the wall abnormality in 32 of the 34 patients, and both techniques missed the same lesion in two patients. The water technique showed more gastric wall details and the lesion's limits could be defined more accurately. The acceptance and tolerance of the gas-producing agent was better in severely ill patients than tap water.en
heal.journalNameGastrointest Radiolen
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewed-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) - ΙΑΤ

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons