Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/17977
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMichalis, L. K.en
dc.contributor.authorRees, M. R.en
dc.contributor.authorDavis, J. A.en
dc.contributor.authorPappa, E. C.en
dc.contributor.authorKatsouras, C.en
dc.contributor.authorGoudevenos, J.en
dc.contributor.authorSideris, D. A.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T18:49:29Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-24T18:49:29Z-
dc.identifier.issn1526-6028-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/17977-
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subjectAdulten
dc.subjectAgeden
dc.subjectAngioplasty/adverse effects/*methodsen
dc.subjectChronic Diseaseen
dc.subjectCoronary Angiographyen
dc.subjectCoronary Disease/radiography/*therapyen
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectIntraoperative Complicationsen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden
dc.subjectPostoperative Complicationsen
dc.subjectRetrospective Studiesen
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen
dc.subjectVibration/*therapeutic useen
dc.titleVibrational angioplasty and hydrophilic guidewires in the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusionsen
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.identifier.primary10.1583/1545-1550(2000)007<0141:VAAHGI>2.3.CO;2-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10821101-
heal.languageen-
heal.accesscampus-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικήςel
heal.publicationDate2000-
heal.abstractPURPOSE: To study the efficacy and safety of vibrational angioplasty versus hydrophilic guidewires for recanalizing chronic total occlusions (CTOs) of the coronary arteries. METHODS: In a retrospective study, 99 patients with old (>3 months) CTOs resistant to conventional techniques were treated either with vibrational angioplasty (group A, n = 72) or 0.014-inch hydrophilic guidewires (group B, n = 27). The selection of the technique (vibrational angioplasty or hydrophylic guidewires) was dependent only upon device availability. A variety of guidewires were employed in conjunction with vibrational angioplasty. RESULTS: The crossing success rates in groups A and B were 86.1% (62/72) and 55.5% (15/27) (p < 0.05), with final procedural success rates of 75% (54/72) and 44.4% (12/27) (p < 0.01), respectively. The main reasons for failure were inability to cross the lesion with a guidewire (10/18 in group A and 12/15 in group B) and large dissections resulting in vessel closure (2/18 in group A and 2/15 in group B). Three major complications were seen, 2 in group A and 1 in group B. Three vessel perforations were reported in group A. Both techniques needed prolonged fluoroscopy times. CONCLUSIONS: Vibrational angioplasty was more successful in treating CTOs compared to hydrophilic guidewires and had similar complication rates (most without clinical sequelae).en
heal.journalNameJ Endovasc Theren
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewed-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) - ΙΑΤ

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Sideris-2000-vibrational angioplasty and.pdf90.36 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons