Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/17286
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPakos, E. E.en
dc.contributor.authorTsekeris, P. G.en
dc.contributor.authorPitouli, E. J.en
dc.contributor.authorGritzeli, S. P.en
dc.contributor.authorBriasoulis, E.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T18:38:09Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-24T18:38:09Z-
dc.identifier.issn0724-4983-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/17286-
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subjectlocalized prostate canceren
dc.subjectradical external radiotherapyen
dc.subjectpostoperative external radiotherapyen
dc.subjectexternal-beam radiotherapyen
dc.subjectdisease-free survivalen
dc.subjecthigh-grade carcinomaen
dc.subjectradiation-therapyen
dc.subjectsalvage radiotherapyen
dc.subjectsingle-institutionen
dc.subjectrisken
dc.subjectirradiationen
dc.subjectadjuvanten
dc.subjectantigenen
dc.titleRadical versus postoperative radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: a 10-year experience of an academic hospitalen
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.identifier.primaryDOI 10.1007/s00345-006-0074-2-
heal.identifier.secondary<Go to ISI>://000238141300017-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs00345-006-0074-2.pdf-
heal.languageen-
heal.accesscampus-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών και Τεχνολογιών. Τμήμα Βιολογικών Εφαρμογών και Τεχνολογιώνel
heal.publicationDate2006-
heal.abstractThis study is a presentation of our department's experience in the treatment of localized prostate cancer with either radical or postoperative radiotherapy (RT). Fifty-five patients with clinical localized prostate cancer were reviewed. Thirty-three patients (T1-T2AN0M0 stage) were treated with radical RT and 22 (T2B-T3N0M0 stage) with postoperative RT. All patients received hormonal therapy. Primary end points of the study were the incidence of clinical and biochemical recurrences and death in the whole group and according to treatment modality. Within a median follow-up of 18 months the overall incidence of clinical relapse was 16.9%, of biochemical relapse 12.7% and of death 10.9%. Both treatment options achieved similar outcomes despite the fact that the patients in the postoperative RT group were of higher stage. Radical RT group tended to have better overall and disease-free survival compared to postoperative RT group, but there was no statistically significant evidence. Long-term toxicity was negligible.en
heal.journalNameWorld Journal of Urologyen
heal.journalTypepeer reviewed-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Pakos-2006-Radical versus posto.pdf202.14 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons