Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/16716
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNindos, A.en
dc.contributor.authorZhang, J.en
dc.contributor.authorZhang, H.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T18:33:19Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-24T18:33:19Z-
dc.identifier.issn0004-637X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/16716-
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subjectsolar-terrestrial relationsen
dc.subjectsun : activityen
dc.subjectsun : coronaen
dc.subjectsun : coronal mass ejections (cmes)en
dc.subjectsun : magnetic fieldsen
dc.subjectsun : photosphereen
dc.subjectkink instabilityen
dc.subjecteruptive flaresen
dc.subjectfield evolutionen
dc.subjectemerging fluxen
dc.subjecteit crinklesen
dc.subjectmotionsen
dc.subjectloopsen
dc.subjectprominenceen
dc.subjectinjectionen
dc.subjectfilamenten
dc.titleThe magnetic helicity budget of solar active regions and coronal mass ejectionsen
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.identifier.secondary<Go to ISI>://000185257600031-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/594/2/1033/pdf/0004-637X_594_2_1033.pdf-
heal.languageen-
heal.accesscampus-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών και Τεχνολογιών. Τμήμα Βιολογικών Εφαρμογών και Τεχνολογιώνel
heal.publicationDate2003-
heal.abstractWe compute the magnetic helicity injected by transient photospheric horizontal flows in six solar active regions associated with halo coronal mass ejections (CMEs) that produced major geomagnetic storms and magnetic clouds (MCs) at 1 AU. The velocities are computed using the local correlation tracking (LCT) method. Our computations cover time intervals of 110-150 hr, and in four active regions the accumulated helicities due to transient flows are factors of 8-12 larger than the accumulated helicities due to differential rotation. As was first pointed out by Demoulin and Berger, we suggest that the helicity computed with the LCT method yields not only the helicity injected from shearing motions but also the helicity coming from flux emergence. We compare the computed helicities injected into the corona with the helicities carried away by the CMEs using the MC helicity computations as proxies to the CME helicities. If we assume that the length of the MC flux tubes is iota = 2 AU, then the total helicities injected into the corona are a factor of 2.9-4 lower than the total CME helicities. If we use the values of iota determined by the condition for the initiation of the kink instability in the coronal flux rope or iota = 0.5 AU then the total CME helicities and the total helicities injected into the corona are broadly consistent. Our study, at least partially, clears up some of the discrepancies in the helicity budget of active regions because the discrepancies appearing in our paper are much smaller than the ones reported in previous studies. However, they point out the uncertainties in the MC/CME helicity calculations and also the limitations of the LCT method, which underestimates the computed helicities.en
heal.journalNameAstrophysical Journalen
heal.journalTypepeer reviewed-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Nindos-2003-The magnetic helicit.pdf2.04 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons