Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/12434Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Kateri, M. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Balakrishnan, N. | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-11-24T17:21:12Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-11-24T17:21:12Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0378-3758 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/12434 | - |
| dc.rights | Default Licence | - |
| dc.subject | Independence | en |
| dc.subject | Association models | en |
| dc.subject | Correlation models | en |
| dc.subject | The Law of Likelihood | en |
| dc.subject | Misleading evidence | en |
| dc.subject | Robust likelihood function | en |
| dc.subject | Adjusted likelihood | en |
| dc.title | Statistical evidence in contingency tables analysis | en |
| heal.type | journalArticle | - |
| heal.type.en | Journal article | en |
| heal.type.el | Άρθρο Περιοδικού | el |
| heal.identifier.primary | 10.1016/j.jspi.2007.02.005 | - |
| heal.language | en | - |
| heal.access | campus | - |
| heal.recordProvider | Πανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Θετικών Επιστημών. Τμήμα Μαθηματικών | el |
| heal.publicationDate | 2008 | - |
| heal.abstract | The likelihood ratio is used for measuring the strength of statistical evidence. The probability of observing strong misleading evidence along with that of observing weak evidence evaluate the performance of this measure. When the corresponding likelihood function is expressed in terms of a parametric statistical model that fails, the likelihood ratio retains its evidential value if the likelihood function is robust [Royall, R., Tsou, T.S., 2003. Interpreting statistical evidence by using imperfect models: robust adjusted likelihood functions. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 65, 391 404]. In this paper, we extend the theory of Royall and Tsou [2003. Interpreting statistical evidence by using imperfect models: robust adjusted likelihood functions. J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Ser. B 65, 391 404] to the case when the assumed working model is a characteristic model for two-way contingency tables (the model of independence, association and correlation models).We observe that association and correlation models are not equivalent in terms of statistical evidence. The association models are bounded by the maximum of the bump function while the correlation models are not. | en |
| heal.publisher | Elsevier | en |
| heal.journalName | Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference | en |
| heal.journalType | peer reviewed | - |
| heal.fullTextAvailability | TRUE | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά). ΜΑΘ | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kateri-2008-statistical evidence in.pdf | 236.74 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
