Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/14535Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Varthis, E. G. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Fotiadis, D. I. | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-11-24T17:38:42Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-11-24T17:38:42Z | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0140-3664 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/14535 | - |
| dc.rights | Default Licence | - |
| dc.subject | ieee 802.11 | en |
| dc.subject | sw | en |
| dc.subject | gbn | en |
| dc.subject | burst acknowledgment | en |
| dc.subject | performance | en |
| dc.subject | throughput | en |
| dc.subject | channels | en |
| dc.title | A comparison of stop-and-wait and go-back-N ARQ schemes for IEEE 802.11e wireless infrared networks | en |
| heal.type | journalArticle | - |
| heal.type.en | Journal article | en |
| heal.type.el | Άρθρο Περιοδικού | el |
| heal.identifier.primary | DOI 10.1016/j.comcom.2005.06.021 | - |
| heal.identifier.secondary | <Go to ISI>://000238184100011 | - |
| heal.identifier.secondary | http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0140366405002446/1-s2.0-S0140366405002446-main.pdf?_tid=4e158fa27c6ecf4a422eb2d5e66b094d&acdnat=1339758760_4c11553500141de65a42967add655943 | - |
| heal.language | en | - |
| heal.access | campus | - |
| heal.recordProvider | Πανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Θετικών Επιστημών. Τμήμα Μηχανικών Επιστήμης Υλικών | el |
| heal.publicationDate | 2006 | - |
| heal.abstract | The upcoming IEEE 802.11e standard adds a new optional acknowledgment scheme, which is called Burst Acknowledgment (BurstAck) in order to support Quality of Service (QoS) and better utilization of the wireless medium (WM). In this paper the efficiency of the well-known Stop-and-Wait (SW) mechanism and the enhanced Burst Acknowledgment (BurstAck) behavior, utilized as a Go-Back-N (GBN) Automatic Repeat Request (ARQ) scheme with Sliding Window is studied. Link parameters such as, the window size of the transmitted MAC protocol data units (MPDUs), the number of stations, (STAs) the frame error rate (FER) and the signal to noise ratio (SNR) are considered. In our analysis, the specific characteristics of the infrared physical layer as well as the 802.11 Management Information Base (MIB) parameters for infrared wireless LANs and the complex behavior of 802.11 MAC protocol are taken into account. The results obtained indicate that BurstAck utilized as GBN performs better for medium sized networks with large window size and not very high FER. However, for small window size, bad channel quality and large networks the GBN scheme is not suggested. (C) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | en |
| heal.publisher | Elsevier | en |
| heal.journalName | Computer Communications | en |
| heal.journalType | peer reviewed | - |
| heal.fullTextAvailability | TRUE | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Varthis-2006-A comparison of stop.pdf | 307.66 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
