Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/11359
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Corrigan, J. R. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Drichoutis, A. C. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Lusk, J. L. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Nayga, R. M. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Rousu, M. C. | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-11-24T17:05:39Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-11-24T17:05:39Z | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0002-9092 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/11359 | - |
dc.rights | Default Licence | - |
dc.subject | bid affiliation | en |
dc.subject | posted prices | en |
dc.subject | induced value experiment | en |
dc.subject | preference reversals | en |
dc.subject | lotteries | en |
dc.subject | d44 | en |
dc.subject | willingness-to-pay | en |
dc.subject | efficient auction | en |
dc.subject | values | en |
dc.subject | information | en |
dc.subject | behavior | en |
dc.subject | accept | en |
dc.subject | models | en |
dc.subject | impact | en |
dc.subject | beef | en |
dc.subject | lab | en |
dc.title | Repeated Rounds with Price Feedback in Experimental Auction Valuation: An Adversarial Collaboration | en |
heal.type | journalArticle | - |
heal.type.en | Journal article | en |
heal.type.el | Άρθρο Περιοδικού | el |
heal.identifier.primary | Doi 10.1093/Ajae/Aar066 | - |
heal.identifier.secondary | <Go to ISI>://000298889000006 | - |
heal.language | en | - |
heal.access | campus | - |
heal.recordProvider | Πανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Οικονομικών και Κοινωνικών Επιστημών. Τμήμα Οικονομικών Επιστημών | el |
heal.publicationDate | 2012 | - |
heal.abstract | It is generally thought that market outcomes are improved with the provision of market information. As a result, the use of repeated rounds with price feedback has become standard practice in the applied experimental auction valuation literature. We conducted two experiments to determine how rationally subjects behave with and without price feedback in a second-price auction. Results from an auction for lotteries show that subjects exposed to price feedback are significantly more likely to commit preference reversals. However, this irrationality diminishes in later rounds. Results from an induced value auction indicate that price feedback caused greater deviations from the Nash equilibrium bidding strategy. Our results suggest that while bidding on the same item repeatedly improves auction outcomes (i.e., reduced preference reversals or bids closer to induced values), this improvement is not the result of price feedback. | en |
heal.journalName | American Journal of Agricultural Economics | en |
heal.journalType | peer reviewed | - |
heal.fullTextAvailability | TRUE | - |
Appears in Collections: | Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) - ΟΕ |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License