Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/11207
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAdam, A.en
dc.contributor.authorKosma, Th.en
dc.contributor.authorMcHugh, J.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T17:04:38Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-24T17:04:38Z-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/11207-
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subjectTrade liberalization, gravity models, stability pact, CEFTA, BFTAen
dc.titleTrade liberation strategies: what Could Southeastern Europe Learn from the CEFTA and BFTA?en
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.languageen-
heal.accesscampus-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Οικονομικών και Κοινωνικών Επιστημών. Τμήμα Οικονομικών Επιστημώνel
heal.publicationDate2003-
heal.abstractThis paper explores the effectiveness of the Central European Free Trade Area (CEFTA) and the Baltic Free Trade Area (BFTA). Estimates from a gravity model and bilateral trade data support the view that both CEFTA and BFTA helped expand regional trade and limit the emergence of a " hub-and-spoke" relationship between the CEECs and the European Union (EU). These empirical conclusions carry some important policy implications for the " second wave" of prospective EU members among Southeastern European Countries (SEECs). The paper argues that the SEECs should reconsider their bilateral approach to trade liberalization and move towards a multilateral free-trade area as exemplified by both the CEFTA and BFTA.en
heal.journalNameIMF Working paperen
heal.journalTypepeer reviewed-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) - ΟΕ

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
adam-trade liberation strategies.pdf319.65 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons