Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/22202
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGelalis, I. D.en
dc.contributor.authorArnaoutoglou, E.en
dc.contributor.authorPakos, E. E.en
dc.contributor.authorPolitis, A. N.en
dc.contributor.authorRapti, M.en
dc.contributor.authorXenakis, T. A.en
dc.contributor.authorPapadopoulos, G.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T19:22:54Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-24T19:22:54Z-
dc.identifier.issn1874-3250-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/22202-
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.titleEffect of interlaminar epidural steroid injection in acute and subacute pain due to lumbar disk herniation: a randomized comparison of 2 different protocolsen
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.identifier.primary10.2174/1874325000903010121-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20111695-
heal.languageen-
heal.accesscampus-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικήςel
heal.publicationDate2009-
heal.abstractIn order to assess the efficacy of epidural steroid injections (ESI) in acute and subacute pain due to lumbar spine disk herniation, we conducted a randomized trial, comparing 2 different protocols. Fourty patients with radicular pain due to L4-L5 and L5-S1 disc herniation were assigned to receive either 3 consecutive ESI every 24 hours through a spinal catheter (group A) or 3 consecutive ESI every 10 days with an epidural needle (group B). All patients had improved Oswestry Disabilty Index (ODI) and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain scores at 1 month of follow-up compared to baseline, while no significant differences were observed between the 2 groups. The scores for group B were statistically significant lower at 2 months of follow-up compared to those of group A. The improvement in the scores of group B was continuous since the mean scores at 2 months of follow up were lower compared to the respective scores at 1 month. Protocol B (3 consecutive ESI every 10 days) was found more effective in the treatment of subacute pain compared to Protocol A (3 consecutive ESI every 24 hours) with statistically significant differences in the ODI and VAS scores at 2 months of follow-up.en
heal.journalNameOpen Orthop Jen
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewed-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) - ΙΑΤ

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons