Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/22136
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChouliaras, V.en
dc.contributor.authorRistanis, S.en
dc.contributor.authorMoraiti, C.en
dc.contributor.authorStergiou, N.en
dc.contributor.authorGeorgoulis, A. D.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T19:21:59Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-24T19:21:59Z-
dc.identifier.issn0363-5465-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/22136-
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subjectAdolescenten
dc.subjectAdulten
dc.subjectAnterior Cruciate Ligament/injuries/physiopathology/*surgeryen
dc.subject*Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graften
dc.subjectFemaleen
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studiesen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectMaleen
dc.subjectMovement/*physiologyen
dc.subjectRange of Motion, Articular/physiologyen
dc.subjectTendons/*transplantationen
dc.subject*Thighen
dc.subjectTibia/*physiopathologyen
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen
dc.subjectWeight-Bearing/physiologyen
dc.titleEffectiveness of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with quadrupled hamstrings and bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts: an in vivo study comparing tibial internal-external rotationen
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.identifier.primary10.1177/0363546506296040-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17251174-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://ajs.sagepub.com/content/35/2/189.full.pdf-
heal.languageen-
heal.accesscampus-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικήςel
heal.publicationDate2007-
heal.abstractBACKGROUND: The 2 most frequently used autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are the bone-patellar tendon-bone and the quadrupled hamstrings tendon. HYPOTHESIS: Hamstring tendon graft is superior to patellar tendon graft in restoring tibial rotation during highly demanding activities because of its superiority in strength and linear stiffness and because it is closer morphologically to the anatomy of the natural anterior cruciate ligament. STUDY DESIGN: Case control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Eleven patients with patellar tendon graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, 11 patients with hamstring tendon graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and 11 controls were assessed. Kinematic data were collected (50 Hz) with a 6-camera optoelectronic system while the subjects descended stairs and, immediately after, pivoted on their landing leg. The dependent variable examined was the tibial internal-external rotation during pivoting. All patients in both groups were also assessed clinically and with the use of a KT-1000 arthrometer to evaluate anterior tibial translation. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that reconstructions with either graft successfully restored anterior tibial translation. However, both anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction groups had significantly increased tibial rotation when compared with the controls, whereas no differences were found between the 2 reconstructed groups. CONCLUSION: The 2 most frequently used autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction cannot restore tibial rotation to normal levels. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: New surgical techniques are needed that can better approximate the actual anatomy and function of the anterior cruciate ligament.en
heal.journalNameAm J Sports Meden
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewed-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) - ΙΑΤ

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Chouliaras-2007-Effectiveness of rec.pdf268.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons