Evolution of treatment effects over time: empirical insight from recursive cumulative metaanalyses (Journal article)
Ioannidis, J./ Lau, J.
Full metadata record
|dc.subject||*Meta-Analysis as Topic||en|
|dc.subject||Myocardial Infarction/*drug therapy/prevention & control||en|
|dc.subject||Obstetric Labor Complications/drug therapy||en|
|dc.subject||Pre-Eclampsia/prevention & control||en|
|dc.subject||*Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic||en|
|dc.title||Evolution of treatment effects over time: empirical insight from recursive cumulative metaanalyses||en|
|heal.recordProvider||Πανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικής||el|
|heal.abstract||Evidence on how much medical interventions work may change over time. It is important to determine what fluctuations in the treatment effect reported by randomized trials and their metaanalyses may be expected and whether extreme fluctuations signal future major changes. We applied recursive cumulative metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the relative change in the pooled treatment effect (odds ratio) over time for 60 interventions in two medical fields (pregnancy/perinatal medicine, n = 45 interventions; myocardial infarction, n = 15 interventions). We evaluated the scatter of relative changes for different numbers of total patients in previous trials. Outlier cases were noted with changes greater than 2.5 standard deviations of the expected. With 500 accumulated patients, the pooled odds ratio may change by 0.6- to 1.7-fold in the immediate future. When 2000 patients have already been randomized, the respective figures are between 0.74- and 1.35-fold for pregnancy/perinatal medicine and between 0.83- and 1.21-fold for myocardial infarction studies. Extreme early fluctuations in the treatment effect were observed in three interventions (magnesium in myocardial infarction, calcium and antiplatelet agents for prevention of preeclampsia), where recent mega-trials have contradicted prior metaanalyses, as well as in four other examples where early large treatment effects were dissipated when more data appeared. Past experience may help quantify the uncertainty surrounding the treatment effects reported in early clinical trials and their metaanalyses. Early wide oscillations in the evolution of the treatment effect for specific interventions may sometimes signal further major changes in the future.||en|
|heal.journalName||Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A||en|
|Appears in Collections:||Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά)|
Files in This Item:
|Ioannidis-2001-Evolution of treatme.pdf||122.69 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:This item is a favorite for 0 people.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.