Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/20709
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGavriilidis, I.en
dc.contributor.authorMotsis, E. K.en
dc.contributor.authorPakos, E. E.en
dc.contributor.authorGeorgoulis, A. D.en
dc.contributor.authorMitsionis, G.en
dc.contributor.authorXenakis, T. A.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T19:09:30Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-24T19:09:30Z-
dc.identifier.issn0968-0160-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/20709-
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subjectAnterior Cruciate Ligament/anatomy & histology/*surgeryen
dc.subjectCadaveren
dc.subjectFemur/*anatomy & histology/surgeryen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectKnee Joint/*anatomy & histology/surgeryen
dc.subjectOrthopedic Procedures/*methodsen
dc.subjectReconstructive Surgical Procedures/*methodsen
dc.subjectTibia/*anatomy & histology/surgeryen
dc.titleTranstibial versus anteromedial portal of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction: a cadaveric studyen
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.identifier.primary10.1016/j.knee.2008.05.004-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18583137-
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://ac.els-cdn.com/S0968016008000859/1-s2.0-S0968016008000859-main.pdf?_tid=d3c7e481b606c337b66da7c2986d06b7&acdnat=1333381804_1245e605b9e5c79bc55838be92393a4e-
heal.languageen-
heal.accesscampus-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικήςel
heal.publicationDate2008-
heal.abstractThe aim of this cadaveric study was to compare the transtibial versus the anteromedial portal with respect to the anatomic femoral positioning of the ACL attachment. Ten fresh frozen cadaveric knees were included in our study. A standard arthroscopy was performed and the normal ACL was partially cut through with arthroscopic scissors leaving a small footprint of 2 mm at the anatomical insertion area on the lateral femoral condyle. The femoral tunnel was drilled through the tibial tunnel and subsequently through the anteromedial portal. Using a probe with standard magnification, we measured the distances of the two femoral tunnels from the margin of ACL footprint arthroscopically. The femurs were then dissected and we measured the distances of the two tunnels from the posterior part of the lateral femoral condyle. The median arthroscopically measured distance of the centers of transtibial femoral tunnel and of the femoral tunnel through the anteromedial portal from the margin of the femoral ACL footprint were 6.20 mm and 2.80 mm respectively. The difference was statistically significant. After femoral dissection the median distance of the centers of the transtibial femoral tunnel and the femoral tunnel performed through the anteromedial portal from the border of the articular surface at the lateral femoral condyle was 6.10 mm and 5.25 mm respectively (p<0.001). Both measurements showed that ACL reconstruction technique through the anteromedial portal is more accurate compared to the transtibial technique.en
heal.journalNameKneeen
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewed-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) - ΙΑΤ

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Gavriilidis-2008-Transtibial versus a.pdf346.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons