Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/19651
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMauri, D.en
dc.contributor.authorKamposioras, K.en
dc.contributor.authorProiskos, A.en
dc.contributor.authorXilomenos, A.en
dc.contributor.authorPeponi, C.en
dc.contributor.authorDambrosio, M.en
dc.contributor.authorZacharias, G.en
dc.contributor.authorKoukourakis, G.en
dc.contributor.authorPentheroudakis, G.en
dc.contributor.authorPavlidis, N.en
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-24T19:01:10Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-24T19:01:10Z-
dc.identifier.issn1088-0224-
dc.identifier.urihttps://olympias.lib.uoi.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/19651-
dc.rightsDefault Licence-
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectMass Screening/*utilizationen
dc.subjectPhysician's Practice Patterns/*trendsen
dc.subjectPredictive Value of Testsen
dc.subjectPrimary Health Care/*trendsen
dc.subjectRadiography, Thoracic/*utilizationen
dc.subjectRisk Assessmenten
dc.titleOld habits die hard: chest radiography for screening purposes in primary careen
heal.typejournalArticle-
heal.type.enJournal articleen
heal.type.elΆρθρο Περιοδικούel
heal.identifier.secondaryhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17090221-
heal.languageen-
heal.accesscampus-
heal.recordProviderΠανεπιστήμιο Ιωαννίνων. Σχολή Επιστημών Υγείας. Τμήμα Ιατρικήςel
heal.publicationDate2006-
heal.abstractOBJECTIVE: To assess whether the use of chest radiography for screening changes over time. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, ISI, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and handsearching of selected journals. REVIEW METHODS: We evaluated whether the proportion of primary care physicians using chest radiography to screen for (1) malignancy in the general asymptomatic population, (2) malignancy in a high-risk subgroup, (3) any disease in the general population, and (4) any disease in a high-risk subgroup changed over time, using random-effects meta-regression analysis. Adjustments for the availability of national guidelines were also performed. RESULTS: Overall, 10% to 90% of primary care physicians reported using chest x-ray for screening. In unadjusted analyses, the proportion of physicians using chest radiography for cancer screening in the general population tended to increase by 0.9% per year (8 studies, n = 4313). The corresponding annual changes were -2.9% for cancer screening in high-risk subgroups (8 studies, n = 2784) and -0.4% regarding screening for any disease in the population (7 studies, n = 2627). No meta-regressions were run for outcome (4) (only 1 study). In the adjusted analyses, there was a decreasing nonsignificant trend for all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite formal recommendations, many physicians still use chest x-ray for screening, with their number decreasing slowly over time. This practice may be harmful because the positive predictive value of chest radiography is low, and further evaluation of false-positive findings might be associated with increased cost and risk from additional diagnostic or therapeutic interventions.en
heal.journalNameAm J Manag Careen
heal.journalTypepeer-reviewed-
heal.fullTextAvailabilityTRUE-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα σε επιστημονικά περιοδικά ( Ανοικτά) - ΙΑΤ

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons